(With thanks to Peter Cruickshank for raising the public money issue, and for suggestions on reading)
On Tuesday 19 June, I was at two events. The first was a meeting of the Scottish Government’s Online Identity Assurance stakeholder group. The second was a seminar on Vote.Scot: Shaping the future of online voting in Scotland. They provided a very interesting set of information and questions. Continue reading
(with thanks to Liam Bell for feedback on the first draft.)
On Tuesday 12 June, I was at a workshop organised by the Scottish Government (SG) to consider how lessons from e-voting, as used in participatory budgeting (PB), can inform SG’s investigations of how e-voting might be used in Scottish elections. A key theme of the discussion was how a system that would initially be used for PB voting could be set up so that it would ‘naturally’ evolve to be used for other voting ‘use-cases’.
It’s not my aim to describe what others said at the meeting: a scribe took detailed notes and I hope that a transcript will be published soon. However, I hope this post will describe my thinking, and how it’s evolved a bit since I last wrote about e-voting. Continue reading
This post is inspired by my taking part in the Open Rights Group (Scotland)‘s e-voting round-table in February, and the Scottish Government’s Online Identity Assurance ‘show and tell’ in March, and by a seminar by Professor Brian Detlor last week. (My notes from the ORG’s round-table should be available on the Open Government Network website. I’ve also posted them on this blog.) In this post, I assume that e-voting would be run on central servers, but votes would be cast via software running on personal phones, tablets and computers. Continue reading
This post is my digital record of the Scottish Government’s Online Identity Assurance (OLA) ‘show and tell’. The day was very informative, and provided me the opportunity to catch up with friends in civil society circles. I’m especially interested because online identity is a natural precursor to online voting, another problematic area that greatly interests me.
The post starts with a recap of what was said at the event, then notes my input at the event. Next are my reactions to the event itself, followed by my thoughts on the whole OLA programme. In summary, while I think OLA is very worthwhile, and that the Scottish Government is trying to do it the right way, I have a lot of reservations about how useful it will be for those who most need government support. Continue reading
(trying to force this to appear on Twitter)
@scotgov consultation on #electoralreform: https://consult.gov.scot/elections/electoral-reform/consultation. Have your say before 29 March!
Open Rights Group: https://www.openrightsgroup.org
SG consultation on electoral reform, including options around e-voting: https://consult.gov.scot/elections/electoral-reform Continue reading
80,000 words = 3 letters
Travel | Road Trip | Thoughts
News, funding opportunities, and support from ENU's Research & Innovation Office
Scotland - Made for Cycling
Democratic Audit monitors democracy and freedom in Britain through a major blog, a series of democracy assessments, reports, commissions and evidence to Parliament
Independent web publisher since 2002
Making democratic conversations
An Injury to One is an Injury to All
Peter Cruickshank on information systems, governance, politics, society, security and where they intersect.
Because Cycling is Life
